Re: Is pacifism within our Western Culture creating violence?

Am 28yrs old & my first encounter with violence was during my very 1st year
in School or Infants as we call it in 1988.

What I remember was feeling angry because of a random attack by a fellow classmate; he hit me for no reason. After the crying & being separated comforted by the Teacher; he did it again. Yet, what occurred in me was a feeling was pure rage.
I just began to slap him again & again & again; The Bully became the victim.

He was curled up in the cloakroom; crying until the same Teacher whom looked after me stooped my attack. When asked why I did it I shouted
"He HIT ME".
I can still instantly connect to the pure feeling of punishing him in that righteous manner.

My classmates along with Teachers we're in shock for the rest of the afternoon. This gave me the realization that being violent isn't popular or impresses people.
Both The Bully & victim (me) we're separated from the rest of the class not in a physical separate desks manner but cold shoulder approach.

I got collected by my Farther who's was told about the incident; he just said in his typical Yorkshire attitude...
"Shouldn't 'ave started with me Lad, should he".

The Teacher actually agreed* [this point is vital, I'll refer to it later].

Later on in my Life my Farther would tell me stories of people in his Industrial Factory Age of working having fights with Management.
Whilst this reads as shocking; it created a natural order equilibrium as Line Management wouldn't exploit the workforce.
If they did then it would no longer be Employee & Manager; it would be Man vs. Man.

Yet, the age of Industry has left the Western World & re-located to China thus we live along with work in the Age of Information... different attitudes (some for the better... Sexual Equality being one) different type of work.

The following day everything was normal expect one classmate called me possibly out of both respect & fear... Panthro Which as the day progressed the majority called me this title expect The Bully.
This is the reason why I was given this nickname & the first in the class to have one.

Watch from 3mins : 48secs (it fades for a short 2second break but returns)



This type of Children's Cartoon wouldn't be allowed in this early 21st Century due to it's pure action based on conflict & violence.

This named stayed with me till the end of Junior school.
Whilst, it was a cool name it was born out of another child connecting me with a tough & violent cartoon character. Due to The Bully feeling pain & humiliation he never repeated his random acts on violence on anybody.

Fights occurred afterwards I might have another two during my time in the Infant & Junior School but the lesson was the pain of getting hit isn't nice unlike what's seen on the TV or Movies.
So, by experiencing such nerves, distress, possible humiliation & pain fighting sort of didn't occur by the time Secondary School happened. The slap's & fists we're replaced by very foul language usually about each others Mother's inspired by the humour of watching...

Then by 12yrs old; you start getting interested in the opposite sex. Girls simply aren't into Boy's that get satisfaction in dishing punches on others; as these types are emotionally backward.

If fights did occur; then they we're allowed to happen in the Playground for a manner of time until the Teacher on duty skilfully broke it up at a stage when both fighters could claim victory thus feeding both Teenage ego's.

That was then, what happens now is...

Due to what I classify as the Feminisation of Western Society; violence / self-defence is frowned upon. A 'Social faux pas' would be the best description.
Due to compensation culture; School's have no choice to forget that *1980's attitude as mentioned earlier & have zero-tolerance even if a Child does so in Self-Defence.

The following 2011 incident from Australia; has gone viral around the world [it's Portuguese subtitles / English audio]:



Yet, BOTH students have been warned about their conduct. When it's obvious that the only one whom should be disciplined is the arrogant Bully.

In the UK; it's now common for students to face expulsion if a fight is 'deemed serious'. These would have been expected just 15yrs previously as a stage of progression.

Currently; in the UK our Children are becoming more violent yet violence is deemed as wrong especially within Compulsory Education. My opinion is that whilst not to be promoted violence around Children needs to be seen as part of the growing process. Elements of human nature whilst not nice are confrontation & violence; the way to solve this is to first expect what we are & we're we came from...

If people didn't get turned on by violence why do people still watch Films about it or have friends round to watch the big Pay-Per-View Boxing Fight.

Some examples that we all are popular within contemporary culture...

That Pencil ain't to complete his Newspaper Crossword..!!

This is perhaps my favourite WWE Match of ALL-Time; simply cause it's vicious:



Feminisation & pacifism is attempting to eradicate these urges in people yet they cannot be controlled. The worrying aspect is Adults are now becoming violent with more regularity especially on a the Saturday night out.
The Booze & Illegal Narcotics play a massive role but they allow the what's inside a person to be released.

Whilst this movement of feminisation & pacifism has good intentions; it's simply having the opposite effect. Then people feeling isolated due to this Capitalist Target Driven Materialistic Being Young / Trendy Vanity obsessed society; people are angry or doubt others & more worrying themselves.
This results in anger.

The ONLY way Human's as a species can evolve is if we expect everything about our collective Psychology... we are greedy, selfish, lustful, jealous, lazy, hard, ignorant, working, disciplined, kind, insightful etc etc...

Yet we try to repress the negative by saying this or that isn't Socially expectable yet the major powers of the Western World fight War's / Conflicts with their Military.

The ironic thing about Violence in School's are the promotion of the Armed Forces in School as a possible career path in the majority of the Western world..!!

The current UK Government want to promote former Military staff to become School Teachers; they claim to re-gain discipline that's been lost especially within areas of poverty. So... people that have been trained to be aggressive & kill on order are now going to be teaching in School's we're children fighting results in possible suspension / expulsion?

This latter point sums up the hypocritical stance that exhibits in the Western World e.g open expression of Pornography is frowned upon yet when major corporations use sexual images in their Ad's it's deemed acceptable even if they are broadcast during Prime Family viewing Time?

The following from America; a nation that has created Mixed Martial Arts Cage fighting & has an obsession with Gun's amongst other violent activities.
Yet, a Mother that demands her Son fight to protect their Family Honour is criticized?



For all the high moral standards; what should occur if a random Man insults a Women in a public situation. The Women expects either the Man she is with or Men in her vicinity to defend her honour.

So much for 21st Century; let's have a conversation & review your behaviour then.

The strangest individual in this is President Barack Obama; why?
In the same month; he authorizes as Commander In-Chief his Military to use
force in Libya against Colonel Gaddafi.
He begins a national Anti-Bullying Campaign:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

If the President views Colonel Gaddafi as being a kinda Bully or more serious kind; why doesn't he start a conversation with him explaining what he's doing is wrong?
Cause am sure the Campaign gives instructions on how to report Bullying & also attempting to show 'why it's not cool to be one'.

So, much for the Noble Institute thinking that giving him the Peace Award might make him more Jimmy Carter than George W. Bush when it comes to Foreign Policy.
Maybe they should ask for it back, perhaps?

Am not saying he shouldn't do anything but the President should of publicly requested a personal meeting with the Colonel to talk about the situation rather than go direct for the attack.

That's approach simply provides evidence why our entire relationship with Violence needs to be understood along with accepted that it's part of who we are for better & worse.

Re: Why I don't interact with Comic Relief.

Before I begin; the origins of my awakening came from the following; yet be warned it involves the highly realistic simulation of a Car Accident.



In the UK; every two years a series endless promotion by the BBC called
Comic Relief; occurs. Like everything; it's origins we're honourable in having mainly BBC Presenters of Television & Radio doing a telethon to raise money.

This normally was rather bland middle of the road type of parody yet sincere...



Unfortunately, in these days & times Celebrity Culture has taken place.
When in the early 1990's, Comics we're just that now they seem to be the standard for making rubbish TV's adverts attempting to flog the latest Financial Services piece of dirt... Home Insurance, Retail Banking, Mortgages.



What can be said about that; I was lost for words by Paul Whitehouse latest TV Ad.

Maybe I'll call him Sh**ehouse; instead.

I noticed that when the recession occurred in 2008; nothing was getting said by mainstream popular Comedians; guess that £ is just to good.
In traditional English Culture; the Jester / Fool / Comedian existed to remind those in authority of how idiotic they are:



Unfortunately, Russell is the exception rather than the rule; as his contemporaries don't have his intellectual observational skills.

Now, to the Comic Relief in it's current form. No longer about those that can tell jokes or work at the BBC. It now includes the plague of British Society...

Fu**ing Celebrities [the actual terminology used by many].

So they earn the spend ridiculous amounts on stuff they don't need; just to fill their empty lives that are based on vanity & ego. Then every two years; they do something for those lesser people.

I suspect it's due to them actually knowing their lives are pathetic along with being false. The need for recognition on a mass level & the fact that they are willing to do anything to keep that spotlight on them.
Be it sex with other Fu**ing Celebrities producing greater f**k-up's to actually being informants grassing other fellow Fu**ing Celebrities in some amateur Machiavellian strategy of one up-bi**hness.

Here is a group of utter tools that went up a African Mountain.



During the time the Fu**ing Celebrities where going up,
I remembered a B-Movie that I watched as a Kid based on actually events...

During quite times at work; I would think & hope that nature could deliver some divine justice. Yet, even the Mountain Baboons realized that the Fu**ing Celebrities are full of sh**e due to over-saturation on Satellite TV.

Maybe it's like what JC mentioned...

Jesus saw the rich putting their gifts into the temple treasury. He also saw a poor widow put in two very small copper coins. "I tell you the truth," he said, "this poor widow has put in more than all the others. All these people gave their gifts out of their wealth; but she out of her poverty put in all she had to live on".

From Theee Good Book - The Poor Widow's Offering (Luke 20:45-21:4)

It seems with life the more things change the more they stay the same.

I advise that rather than donate to Comic Relief select a charity that doesn't
overload on the Fu**ing Celebrities, perhaps...

So, to the end of this Blog Entry. Something so horrific that it makes Chris Moyles in the throws of penetrative missionary position sexual intercourse whilst talking dirty drenched in sweat; seem erotic.

Re: If everybody owned a Ferrari; it wouldn't be special.

Imagine living in a world we're owning a Ferrari was a common experience?
You'd use it to go to the local Supermarket for the weekly food supplies,
going to work, even driving it to the nearest municipal rubbish dump to get rid of some useless stuff you've had for years in that Garden Shed over a May Bank Holiday.

Just have a look at a selected few...

You might view it as actually being fun yet this experience will soon go pretty fast (get the pun pretty & fast = Ferrari). Everybody would have one, suddenly something that's was attractive partly due to it's exclusivity would become the new Model T-Ford expect in different colours rather than black.

You might be reading this thinking; has he gone insane about a ridiculous vision of a future world. No; just a clever original example of what will occur to the UK due to the over-population capacity of it's University system.
If 1 of of every 3 UK Citizens under the age of 35yrs old will have a University Degree by 2020; then what's the point?

When I attended University in the late 1990's; the size felt just right. It wasn't empty yet even during exams the Library didn't seem crammed.

A friend that now teaches in the same institution told me over Lunch one January afternoon that the Library has to have a member of University Security on the door as if a Nightclub to regulate the amount of people entering & exiting.
Yet, the reason for Security came around a confrontation between two undergraduates over incorrect usage of University PC around Facebook.

This actually occurred:

Student 1: Excuse me, I've been watching you?

Student 2: Why?

Student 1: Why are you on Facebook, when people are queuing in the cold to enter the Library. Couldn't you look at that at Home.

Student 2: You had better read the screen.

Student 1: [Read's the screen then realizing she's made a huge faux pas] Ohhh... it's about your Exam.

Student 2: [In a raised voice] Who the f**k do you think you are; looking at my screen. You some sort of perv?

Student 1: Erm... am so sorry [then suddenly realizing that she's been called in the Universities Main Library a Sexual Delinquent] What the f**k did you just call me.

Student 2: A fu**ing dirty bi**h; go & try to learn something you ugly cow.

[As the row get's worse; a member of the University Security arrives after 5mins & duly arrests both possibly under Citizens legality.
Then escorts them out of the building towards his Office.
The Library staff wishing to 'draw a line in the sand' order everybody out of the building which is closed for the rest of the day during one of it's most hectic periods].

As a result Students 1 & 2 had to collectivity meet the Vice-Chancellor & wait for a decision if they would be expelled (almost an impossibility) from the institution. It was decided that they would receive a final warning around their personal conduct along with having to do a number of hours each week volunteering in the local community at one of the Universities projects for the remaining time attending the institution.

My academic friend mentioned that this sent shock-waves through the University but was in his words 'a Volcano primed to explode'.

(Sort of nice but worrying Photo cause it's nice; if you get me?)

As the University has to many people within it... Students, Teaching & Non-Teaching staff. Even if the University would expand in size it still wouldn't be enough.

That's the central point of this Blog Entry...

The British University system was established around the late 19th Century due to increasing developments in technology along within making sure that the British Empire was ahead of its European rivals.
People who attended where from the higher reaches of UK Society & this remained the case apart from those lucky exceptional poorer few gaining entry via scholarships or the Access Course entry level in the early 1980's.

Then this fella came with what I view as good intention's in the early 1990's to change UK Universities & the society...

John Major's life story might eventually be made into a rather good Motion Picture. A man who's parents worked in a Circus becoming Prime Minster of at the time the 4th Wealthiest Nation in the World is some achievement.
Yet, what makes Major so interesting is he achieved in a Society & Political Party that's about restricting Social Mobility.

Then by some clever 'Jedi Mind Trick' get's his party to agree that making
Higher Education more inclusive was essential to Britain's future development he even worked with Labour to make this occur. By getting total support for this in Parliament; a drive has since occurred starting in Compulsory Education around the importance of University.

Yet, whilst I admire Major for at least thinking outside the traditional Tory Box his aim was for continued economic growth of the UK rather than an enlightenment renaissance in developing natural academic curiosity in the population.

For anything to succeeded it must always look at it's origins & for Universities we must go far-back into the Ancient World...

Education of a higher level in Greece was about the advancement of humanity not about the development of

just to increase GDP & maintain that all important AAA grade.

Then what of Young People; don't they see that getting a Degree is devalued year on year simply due to more people taking the exact degree than when they graduated?
All that effort & debt for earning a salary that is lower than people whom took the same degree 10yrs previously..!!

It seems rather than looking at the big picture going to University is now a 'rights of passage' experience but you've got to remember the UK is a nation of Zombies walking in a direction with no aim or purpose.

Britain is best described in the last moments of the Titanic; everybody knew it was going down yet the Band kept playing on the deck of the Ship.

So, the only one's that win are big business in that they have a workforce whom can process large amounts of information, are in debt & desperate to live the illusion of Middle Class lifestyle...

The British University system can only ever work if the people involved within it view it more as the Ancient Greeks did rather than the embarrassing present...

Education exists for both the progression & improvement of Society; this has been forgotten.

Re: The Weather & The British.

Am a British Citizen born.

Yet, what has always puzzled me is the national obsession around the Weather.

As you can see only thing worse is the fashion sense of Michael Fish..!!

I've travelled to various locations around the world...

Melbourne, Valencia, Boston, Rio de Janeiro, Munich, Vancouver & Stockholm.

When talking to residents of these cities; nobody moans about their various climates. Not even a word; they get on with their lives.

This then gave me realization around possible origins or background on why us Brits constantly moan about something we can do nothing about?
Then I answered my own question... the desire to travel within the British psyche.

I remember reading; only the Japanese spend more on travel for pleasure / vacation than the British. Yet, the natural national reason the people of Japan do this is around two reasons:

1. For centuries, their island was deliberately closed to the rest of the world until the Americans came post-Hiroshima & Nagasaki.

2. A direct bi-product of the first point was an social awakening resulting in a desire to interact with the rest of the world.

These two points resulted in Japan leading the world in many fields; as people travel then come back with new fresh ideas.

Yet, if the British are at No.2 for the amount spent on Foreign Vacations why hasn't this impacted on positive Social-Economic change like the Japanese?

The answer is due to the fact that deep down British population is unhappy.

I can only guess that it's due to the Class-System which tells people they should be happy?

Exhibit A:

British people endlessly talk about needing a long-hot Summer yet the
simple fact is that due to not having such high temperatures; they simply go berserk.

The thing that they endlessly talk about ultimately is that thing of which they can't handle; it's not helped by vast amounts of alcohol consumed.

Britain doesn't have a national identity; perhaps making it the ONLY nation
to be like this? Belgium is made up of two distinctive groups yet they this equals strong identity even if they have of the date of this Blog no government.

'The highest family in the land' is really German with touches of Dutch & French (Norman).

The UK doesn't celebrate a national day of patron saint unlike the majority of its continental neighbours; even that it has one?
No real culture excites as this connects with the actual embarrassing & heinous time that the nation ruled 25% of the planets land mass...
'Theeee British Empire'.

So, having no real national day makes it possible for the acts of
Empire a.k.a Britishness(what ever this is?) isn't really faced up to.

I remember watching this Advert from a traditional established British Company...

Exhibit B:



When it was realised, the amount of conversations I directly had or overheard was numerous.

A simple advert seemed to open the desires on a nation.

Am sure that warmer climates do make people more expressive; as you can walk & not have to deal with driving through a blizzard (like I had to do on at least 3 occasions so far in 2011).

Another obvious is that living in a warmer tropical climate makes people both more expressive
& sexual.

Exhibit C:

Like New Orleans.

Yet, the majority of Warm to Hot Climates are places of tension & conflict & this must not be forgotten

So maybe instead of moaning we should be happy with this every evening...

She's an improvement on Michael.

For a laugh, have a check of:

http://www2.tv-ark.org.uk/weather/bbc.html


Classic stuff; yet why would an individual(s) make such a well informed website..!!

Re: My week of joining Twitter & Egypt.

I've decided to finally join Twitter as a means of promoting my Blog.
Yet, when I joined I didn't realize how powerful it really is all from 
a format that allows just 140 Characters. 


By connecting with Twitter, I can connect instantly with all types of
people. That's it's power the instant delivery of information, thoughts &
emotions. All at the same time; by-passing the normal routes that release
information to the wider population such as Newspapers.


With what's occurring in Egypt it's actually blown my mind with the 
amount of instant reporting for ordinary people via Twitter.

This has lead me to the conclusion that the Internet with various software
& Websites will change the world dramatically within the next 100.
Individualism is constantly projected by the free-market economic structure
yet a bi-product of this is people view themselves as being separate.
This has created especially within the UK, a erosion of Community.


I predict that as the technology becomes established within the psyche of 
the population...


i.e:


Twitter being used by a sizeable percentage of the UK's population.


This will result in too many voices along with the fact that due to the 
pseudonym nature of the 'net; strong honest & at times uncontrollable
opinions shall be expressed resulting in possible tension / civil unrest.


Yet, what is exciting is the fact that ordinary people via the Internet are
understanding whom has the wealth along with resources.
At this current time, people exist whom have obtained more wealth than
any period of History. 
With this fact, ordinary people will begin to ask questions on why their
standards or *quality of life is decreasing whilst those with wealth increase
on extravagant levels.


This will eventually result in mass open protest having its origins in 
Social Network such as Twitter.


Marx prophecy it seems will occur as 'The Workers' or ordinary people
will begin to understand the reality of economics therefore demanding more
eventually via conflict.


The weakness of wealth is that's its simply an elite 'v.i.p club' & due to
the promotion of free market individualism; people believe they have
a right to enter & might do via collective pressure.


So an invention that is currently used to generate massive revenue streams
for the already wealthy will eventually topple them.


* The term... 'quality of life' will increase in usage & I predict will indicate 
unhappiness within a population. 
A term that had its origins in academic circles will become a common used term.


If you want to connect with me via Twitter:


Iso21stCentMan          

Re: Is this the end of King Rupert's Empire?

All Empire's are designed to end as they make numerous enemies.

This might occur to News International in 2011; as they have pushed
their power to far in both the UK & America.

Whilst Political Class has lost all control over the Banking Sector they
will never lose control or say over the mass media.
Fox News within a few short weeks has seen a major 'sea-change' against
it's unique style of reporting in America.
Whilst in the UK; the 'normal person on the street' that doesn't really do Blogs or TV News instead being self-obsessed are beginning to know about the controversial stuff alleged to have gone on at
The News of the World Newspaper.

When you over-hear these 'normal people' be that on Public Transport or in Elevators talking about such headlines with disapproval tones; am starting to think that the Empire is rocking. Am sure similar types of chatter occurred just before Romania kicked off or Rosa Parks simply couldn't be bothered to move to another seat.

All things in life start small then if they are tough / in the right living conditions grow & grow until being such a size that it cannot be ignored as it once was.

The entire irony of what's occurring being that News International has always had an obsession with sensational headlines & celebrity.
What they forgot is celebrities with the aid of the Internet can directly
bi-pass them now to reach their fan base & worldwide.

The more important error that News International did was not change their method of reporting on the private lives of these Celebrities.
In the 1980's; it was allowed to write what they pleased or say what they wanted...
they where the only game in town.

It's now 2011; even the Iranian & Russian Governments their OWN TV News 24hr Stations that can be viewed in both nations that aren't necessarily fans therefore even bi-passing the elected Anglo-American governments.

In this new age, Celebrities have serious wealth we're in the 1980's they became rich. Wealth is money that has longevity; some individuals earn more in death than being alive. These Celebrities have wealth now;
so can in-fact take on legally News International even through the expensive British Legal System.

Yet, whilst a Blogger realized that the 'game had changed' either out of being arrogant or like some many Empires being to bloated to move. News International just went on like it was the 80's.

So, we have the resignation of Andy Coulson that some say was the decent thing to do.Yet, it get's people talking or gossip.

The latter that both The News of the World & The Sun are so good at creating.

Yet, the goss is about them how ironic indeed.

News International have upset / hurt numerous people throughout the years; maybe the following saying is appropriate...

'payback's a bi%*h'.          

Some of these people are wealthy & maybe have connected using logic to feel that

'my enemy is also your's therefore we are allies'.  

I've got a feeling 2011 is going to be very interesting for News International on BOTH sides of the Atlantic.

Freedom of expression is important yet it comes with responsibility.

I found the below segment shown on Channel4 News, very interesting indeed.

Yet before you do have a read of the following; it's Headline is real...

Sun editor admits paying police officers for stories

Source:  http://tinyurl.com/you-admitted-this-rebekah-wade

Re: Democracy or Demoncracy?

It's been a strange couple of days in the UK; the origins of this is around the notion of freedom.


The UK Government seems displeased that the BBC decided to broadcast 
allegations of corruption around FIFA - 'Fifa's Dirty Secrets'; just before that organization votes with a possibility that could bring the World Cup 'home' to England.


Then the release of confidential American State Department reports by Wikileaks. Hilary Clinton -  Secretary of State response to the public exposure was an... "... attack on America's foreign policy interests".  


Am sure The UN secretary-general, Ban Ki-moon isn't going to accept this 'logic' as according to Wikileaks, America hacked (the irony) into senior UN Staff's E-Mail's & IT Systems.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/28/us-embassy-cables-spying-un 


Now the American-Anglo 'party-piece' is constantly about the promotion of freedom which can ONLY be achieved via that old saying 'thee rule of law'.


The BBC wanted a response from FIFA around it's allegations that included a confidential document listing 175 payments totalling about $100m (£64m) all 'on the down-low'.


You guessed it, FIFA didn't want to respond.


Yet, I've got a nice connection between FIFA & Wikileaks - Qatar.
The Gulf Nation is determined to be the 1st Muslim Nation to host a FIFA World Cup Finals in 2022.  It's determination is such that they are willing to create new-technology that will transform Solar Energy into outdoor cold air-conditioning that will make playing / training in June - July possible even if outside will be 41°C (106°F) ..!!


For all Qatar's enthusiasm according to those secret Wikileaks memorandums the same place that does major league fund-raising for a 'certain tall fella' that's got a $50million 'price tag'. 
ABC News (America) even had the following headline:
'Qatari Royal Family Linked to Al Qaeda'.
Source: ABC News, 7 Feb 2010


The article by Brian Ross & David Scott mentions...
"Certainly it is well-documented that there is one member of the Qatar royal family that supports al Qaeda," said Rohan Gunaratna, the author of the book Inside Al Qaeda and professor at St. Andrews University in Scotland.


Now for a nation that has such wealth the ease that legal action could be taken against both Prof. Gunaratna & ABC News would be like a Child taking up the offer of if they wanted Ice Cream. Instant with total focus, yet they haven't which is worrying especially when the American Military has its Middle Eastern base in the same place.


What's going on?


That's the question, it seems Qatar are 'all things to everybody' yet what are our leaders that we vote for are saying around this confusing contradiction? Nothing, that's what. 
So, on Thursday FIFA could make an important decision to host a major global event in a nation that a number of wealthy & influential individuals fund the world's biggest group of nut jobs obsessed with making the entire world population convert to Islam by force.


It's not like this information is secret yet this example on a Blog of an ordinary person should convince you the reader that all talk of freedom is simply that talk. 
The rule is if you've got the money then allowances can be made even it creates a twisted relationship that's something like a David Lynch Film called -  Demoncracy. 


Am fed-up of the total hypocrisy & contradiction that's occurring in the world by those that should be respected along with lead society. 
Yet, hope exists in the form of this the Internet something that was initially created for the American-Anglo Military Combo might in time actually be a force for peaceful global improvement via awareness. 
In providing 'light' on the 'darkness of lies'


We just might get Democracy, after all.... perhaps?


Additional Information....
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/shocker-admits-saudi-donors-chief-financiers-al-qaeda-leaked-cable/